Peer review is the process of evaluating an author's scholarly work by a group of experts/peers with relevant expertise in the field. Reviewers assess submitted manuscripts for quality, originality and suitability, which helps the editorial board make decisions. Peer review is a vital component of Meditio's open access publishing policies and is responsible for disseminating high-quality research.

Meditio employs a double-blind peer review policy, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed. This process encourages reviewers to be more objective and accurate in their comments on publications.

Meditio Publications invites scholars, academicians, researchers, and scientists with doctorates to apply for a position on our reviewer board. To express interest, reach us at [email protected]

Roles & Responsibilities

• Reviewers can make the following recommendations to the editorial team about the submission: Accept in its current form, Accept following minor revisions, Accept following major revisions, Reject
• At no point should reviewers reveal their identifying information.
• Reviewers should send their feedback without bias or prejudice.
• Meditio requests that reviewers notify the journal editor if they have a conflict of interest that may influence the review report in any way.
• Reviewers must follow the review process timeline outlined in the review invitation.
• Reviewers evaluate the research/work using the Reviewer Form that the editorial team provides, offering feedback on changes and recommending approval or rejection based on the uniqueness, scientific value, quality of presentation and scope of the work.
• Reviewers should get in touch with the designated editor or editorial office right away if they have any questions about the manuscript.
• In the event that an invitation is rejected, reviewers may recommend alternative reviewers. And can request more time if necessary to complete the review report.